{"id":1788,"date":"2022-01-05T16:28:59","date_gmt":"2022-01-05T21:28:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ancientislands.org\/?p=1788"},"modified":"2022-01-06T05:25:03","modified_gmt":"2022-01-06T10:25:03","slug":"polks-gateway-plan-was-supposed-to-protect-environment-and-rural-lands-it-took-planning-commission-make-it-happen","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ancientislands.org\/?p=1788","title":{"rendered":"Polk\u2019s Gateway Plan Was Supposed To Protect Environment and Rural Lands; It Took The Planning Commission To Make It Happen"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Last year Ancient Islands Sierra joined the fight to derail a proposal to wrest more development reviews from the Polk County Planning Commission and turn the process over to a hearing officer and to make it more onerous for the public to appeal hearing officer decisions.\n<\/p>\n<p>The majority of the County Commission agreed with our criticisms and killed the idea.\n<\/p>\n<p>That decision&#8217;s value certainly came into play Wednesday when the Planning Commission was reviewing a proposal to develop a city-sized subdivision proposed to contain more than 1,000 new in a rural area along the Peace Creek Canal  east of Bartow under the procedure that planners  and some development interests sought to take away from them.\n<\/p>\n<p>County planners as they almost always do, recommended approval with conditions, but it was clear based on some of the conditions that this proposal was incompatible with surrounding rural homesteads.\n<\/p>\n<p>The fact that the recommended buffering involved earthworks and a block wall that rose to probably half the height of the wall the islanders used to keep out King Kong was telling.\n<\/p>\n<p>Then there are the provisions of something called the Gateway Selected Area Plan that dates to 2016.\n<\/p>\n<p>The plan was supposedly a guide to future development along the State Road 60 corridor between U.S. 27 and the outskirts of Bartow about where this proposed development is located.\n<\/p>\n<p>However, it was clear Wednesday that the stated policies in the original plan and actual implementation have diverged, seemingly to the detriment of rural residents and environmental features.\n<\/p>\n<p>It initially did not propose to change land uses in the area, but testimony Wednesday showed that had occurred anyway.\n<\/p>\n<p>It was also supposed to protect agricultural lands and environmental features such as the Peace Creek Drainage Canal. Although the plan didn&#8217;t say this, the protection of the Peace Creek was more important than many people realize. That&#8217;s because this section of the waterway was actually a natural stream in the middle of the 19<sup>th<\/sup> century, according to historical maps. Other parts of the current system farther from the Peace River were a series of sloughs and other wetlands that were dredged to drain land for agriculture.\n<\/p>\n<p>But reading the staff report and listening to the applicant&#8217;s consultant, you wouldn&#8217;t have gotten much of a sense of this.\n<\/p>\n<p>The development around the creek was discussed in terms of preventing downstream flooding more than preserving natural habitat.\n<\/p>\n<p>The planned houses were more of the same standard argument about housing shortages and growth pressures rather than whether this was a smart place to build in the first place.\n<\/p>\n<p>There is a reason the pioneers established Bartow where it is rather than out there.\n<\/p>\n<p>This brings us back to the value of the Planning Commission.\n<\/p>\n<p>Sure, the staff report seemed to check all of the right boxes. which may have satisfied the legalistic requirements a  hearing officer might be interested  in examining.\n<\/p>\n<p>But the big picture gets lost in that kind of evaluation and the collective thinking of a diverse group can cut through the claims and get to the heart of the matter.\n<\/p>\n<p>That led the panel to vote unanimously to deny the application.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\n\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\n\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last year Ancient Islands Sierra joined the fight to derail a proposal to wrest more development reviews from the Polk County Planning Commission and turn the process over to a hearing officer and to make it more onerous for the public to appeal hearing officer decisions. The majority of the County Commission agreed with our [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1788","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gci"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ancientislands.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1788","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ancientislands.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ancientislands.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ancientislands.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ancientislands.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1788"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.ancientislands.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1788\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1793,"href":"https:\/\/www.ancientislands.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1788\/revisions\/1793"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ancientislands.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1788"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ancientislands.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1788"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ancientislands.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1788"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}